I would hesitate a very long time before criticizing Grant's designs so I can only assume the picture does not show the full story of this tree or maybe I'm missing the full impact of the design.
Unfortunately the photo was taken at an angle that does not show the true front at eye level with the trunk.
If you want informed opinions why give us an inferior picture? Surely a good, accurate picture that truly shows the tree would enable us to offer better opinions?
I would have thought tilting the trunk the opposite direction would change the vertical trunk and the 90 degree first bend to something more attractive????
You also appear to have 2, maybe 3 branches coming from very close together at the first branching. I know Grant is very strong on 2x2 branching structure but maybe there is no alternative in this case?
Sometimes in workshops we design an inferior 'immediate' tree that will look ok at the end of the session rather than the best 'future' tree that will be almost nothing at the end of the session but could ultimately grow to be a far better tree.
