C. pityoides/sieberi
Posted: February 10th, 2023, 4:44 pm
I have some comparative photos of what I have labelled as each - the sieberi are a fair bit older, but you can see the difference in leaf size and habit.
C. pityoides - smaller leaves, thinner and slower growing. Not as thick a bark, possibly.
Another - same have quite interesting roots.
C. sieberi = Melaleuca paludicola
and another. They can grow quite thickly and dense, with good taper.
A small C. pityoides in front of a C. sieberi for comparison. Both good fun.
It was explained to me by a patient botanist that there is a wider range of difference between the extremes of Callistemon and the extremes of Melaleuca individually, than there is between the Genuses themselves. And the genetic analysis shows that they are more closely related than appearances would suggest. It's all beyond me. I wish they'd make up their minds.
Gavin
C. pityoides - smaller leaves, thinner and slower growing. Not as thick a bark, possibly.
Another - same have quite interesting roots.
C. sieberi = Melaleuca paludicola
and another. They can grow quite thickly and dense, with good taper.
A small C. pityoides in front of a C. sieberi for comparison. Both good fun.
It was explained to me by a patient botanist that there is a wider range of difference between the extremes of Callistemon and the extremes of Melaleuca individually, than there is between the Genuses themselves. And the genetic analysis shows that they are more closely related than appearances would suggest. It's all beyond me. I wish they'd make up their minds.
Gavin