I asked a well known bonsai master in the USA for his opinion and this was his response....
"Unless someone can improve on what our goals are when we supplement the availability of plants' nutritional needs, let's accept the following as the ideal":
Ideally, we would work toward ensuring that all the nutrients plants normally secure from the soil are in the soil solution at all times, in the ratio at which the plant actually uses the nutrients, and at a concentration high enough to ensure no deficiencies yet low enough to ensure the plant isn't impeded in its ability to take up water and the nutrients dissolved in water.
"In order to achieve this goal, we need to know what our urine contains. and particularly whether or not it contains chemicals we would rather not have finding their way into our bodies. It's probably a safe bet to assume there would be some N, P, K, Ca, Mg, and S, but we're not going to know how much of these nutrients are present, which is a disadvantage if we choose to use it. Also, we don't know about its ability to supply the minor elements. Which leads to the point that if we decide to use urine as a fertilizer, in order for our nutritional supplementation to be ideal, using a second fertilizer or a list of nutrients other than urine will be required. IOW, it's probably not a good idea to depend on urine alone as your supplementation program in its entirety, which begs the question, "So what do we do now? What do we use to compliment our nutritional supplementation w/o creating limitations either by way of deficiency or excess (toxicity). We can't know unless we know what we supply in the urine (or fish tank water or pond water ......)
If we use a second fertilizer to supplement the urine, unless we know what's IN the soil AND what we're providing, the potential for the program to be limiting far outweighs the potential for benefits when comparing regimens of urine application vs a complete and balanced soluble synthetic fertilizer.
So, if you're going to supplement with another fertilizer, why not eliminate urine's potential limitations and choose a soluble synthetic that has ALL the essential nutrients in a soluble form, the ratio of which closely matches that at which the plant actually uses the nutrients?
If, in order to simply SAY you use urine as a fertilizer, you must accept the limitations inherent in its use, limitations easily avoided, it doesn't make sense to travel that trail"
I guess I'll pee in the watering can only in an emergency.
