Page 2 of 2
Re: 3rd Look! No clothes.
Posted: July 29th, 2011, 4:04 pm
by Gerard
Sorry Bodhi,
not an alder

Re: 3rd Look! No clothes.
Posted: July 29th, 2011, 4:29 pm
by Jarrod
Cornus?
Re: 3rd Look! No clothes.
Posted: July 29th, 2011, 4:41 pm
by Gerard
Gerard wrote:
Sorry Bodhi,
not an alder

Sorry David it's not crazy filbert,
Sorry Jarrod not cornus
Did anybody pick up on the clue

Re: 3rd Look! No clothes.
Posted: July 29th, 2011, 4:46 pm
by nishiki3
tilia?
Re: 3rd Look! No clothes.
Posted: July 29th, 2011, 4:53 pm
by Gerard
Sorry Nishiki, not tilia
Bretts suggested it might be a larch, I told him false.
Re: 3rd Look! No clothes.
Posted: July 29th, 2011, 4:55 pm
by Jarrod
Nothafagus Gunnii ????
Re: 3rd Look! No clothes.
Posted: July 29th, 2011, 5:05 pm
by Gerard
Sorry Jarrod, it's not a noth a.... (I don't know that one)
It belongs to the family "pinaceae" and is deciduous
Re: 3rd Look! No clothes.
Posted: July 29th, 2011, 5:07 pm
by nishiki3
japanese larch?????????
Re: 3rd Look! No clothes.
Posted: July 29th, 2011, 5:08 pm
by nishiki3
european larch????!!!
Re: 3rd Look! No clothes.
Posted: July 29th, 2011, 5:11 pm
by Steven
Pseudolarix amabilis?
Re: 3rd Look! No clothes.
Posted: July 29th, 2011, 5:13 pm
by Jarrod
Pseudolarix
Northafagus is false beech i think, tassie native
Re: 3rd Look! No clothes.
Posted: July 29th, 2011, 5:17 pm
by Gerard
Steven wrote:Pseudolarix amabilis?
Nice work Steven. Pseudolarix (false larch)
Sometimes called a golden larch, it is not a larch (larix) at all. It is more closely related to the Keleleeria and the cedrus.
220px-Pseudolarix_amabilis.jpg
220px-Golden_Larch_Bonsai_Forest.jpg
Re: 3rd Look! No clothes.
Posted: July 29th, 2011, 5:50 pm
by Bretts
Never heard of that one before so I was right to give up after Elm
I started to wonder why you had quoted me so many times

Re: 3rd Look! No clothes.
Posted: July 30th, 2011, 12:10 am
by Gerard
I was trying very hard to give hints,
it is a beautiful species with really bright green soft foliage. Perhaps a bit sensitive for our climate. I am sure there would be a few about but only one other I have seen.