Re: Thoughts on carving in general
Posted: July 23rd, 2013, 4:48 pm
To agree with Gavin about the need for carving to be believable, when Mauro Stemberger was here, he stressed the importance of adding depth and texture to carved areas. To simply take off the bark, as many people do, does not give a believable picture. My pet peev is jins that have not been distressed to simulate a broken branch and the flat branch cut is visible at the end.GavinG wrote:I'm with Ken - it has to be believable. When a trunk is thick, smooth, dead straight, and heavily carved to disguise an obvious chop, it doesn't work for me. If the trunk is gnarly or twisted, it fits better. The same with dead wood on junipers - if the trunk is already thin, to take the bark off half of it, and bleach it just makes it look even thinner.
From my reading and one trip to Kokufu, (and I will happily be corrected) for exhibition quality bonsais, the Japanese prefer no carving on deciduous trees like maples. It is even preferred when uro heal over and disappear. On the other hand, I have a personal preference for 'spooky' highly carved trees and love hollows like uro and sabamiki.