Pup wrote:Ben10000 wrote:Hi Pup
Probably not worth dragging out this thing of what type pf Maleluca it is!!!! but then again i dont want to look like an idiot to fellow club members telling one thing and it is on fact another but im certain it is not a bracteata only reason i say this is the foliage is very different to each other i will post a macro photo and show the difference but to me the foliage looks like linarilifolia.
cheers Ben
This comment leaves me puzzled. I thought you wanted to know what species of Melaleuca it is. If you are so adamant it is what you say why ask
The only thing i am adamant about is that it would not be a bracteata reason i say this is that i have a couple and they vary in many ways, such as the bark texture and foliage, i do want to know what type of Melaluca it is, but maybe the photo is just a bit deceiving with the bark texture. The first Melaluca i posted isn't as well aged as the one you have showen, so im guessing the papery bark hasn't developed yet,
You will note, in your macro pictures the branches and leaves are hairy as in Bracteata, which is a variable plant any way and the bark on yours also fits the description.
Which is not papery
This is one reason I post very little now.
Pup!!!!

I'm not sure what you mean about the branches in the Macro photos or the leaves are hairy, all i can say is that i see a difference in both structure and colour, again maybe photo is decieving

, also not sure what you mean about the bracteata being a variable plant, does this mean that it can have a variation in foliage as in colour

im no eggspert

by any means and dont profess to be one im only going by what i see in front of me. I dont mean to be discouraging or offend and i think it comes down to the Picture not being clear.
Peace
Ben